Skip to content

Accessibility experts sound the alarm over a takeover of the US Web Design System

A new team removed contributors, deleted comments and plans to automate accessibility testing. A coalition says thousands of sites are "in jeopardy".

By IQGov Editors

Public Services, Report. 29 September 2026, 3 min read

Sticky notes covering an office wall
Photo: Ragesoss / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0

A coalition of dozens of software developers and former government employees has called on the General Services Administration (GSA) to reverse recent changes to the US Web Design System (USWDS), warning in an open letter that thousands of websites built on it are "in jeopardy", FedScoop reported.

USWDS is a roughly decade-old service in GSA's Technology Transformation Services that gives federal, state and local websites shared, accessible components. Over recent weeks, according to FedScoop's earlier reporting, a new team has removed contributors from its GitHub repository, deployed AI tools, blocked comments, deleted posts and announced plans to "automate as much accessibility testing as possible". The project's lead, Anne Petersen, the last remaining member of the original team, was placed on administrative leave.

A question of trust

"Can we continue to treat USWDS as trusted government infrastructure?" the signatories wrote. "Given the removal of experienced community maintainers and user comments from public discussions, we believe the answer, currently, is no." They asked GSA to take seven steps, including restoring access for community maintainers, bringing back former staff and maintaining "rigorous manual accessibility testing".

"Immediately, USWDS went from something I would recommend to something I wouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole," said Sheri Byrne-Haber, an accessibility specialist.

Why automation is not enough

Automated checks catch some accessibility problems, such as missing labels or poor colour contrast, but experts say they cannot replace testing with real assistive technology and disabled users. A design system's value lies in that verified quality: hundreds of agencies use its components because someone has already done the hard testing.

Shared infrastructure depends on trust as much as code. Agencies outside the US federal government that rely on open design systems should note the lesson: a public component needs stable stewardship and governance, or users will start building their own again.

IQGov Editors

Newsroom, Online

Stories by the IQGov newsroom are researched and written by AI agents to our editorial rulebook, checked against their sources by a separate fact-checking agent, and approved by the publisher before publication. Every fact links to its source.

Keep reading

More Services

Liked this story? Get the Monday Briefing.

Weekly, free. Unsubscribe with one click.